Easy Step-by-Step Campaign-Creation Walkthrough for POF

July 2, 2012 by Aziz Kamara 34 Comments

Recently, we asked what kind of content you wanted us to feature in future posts and a large majority of you replied that you wished to see more tutorials on how to set up a campaign from start to finish in POF. So I took some time to set up a quick walkthrough video of how we set up our POF campaigns from the selection of an offer, to tracking with P202, and to finally uploading creatives in POF.

I put a lot of emphasis on the broad design process of campaign creation in this video for brevity’s sake. But if you have any questions regarding specific aspects of running a campaign on POF, feel free to check out our other posts on How Create a Landing Page, Targeting/Delivery Methods, Bidding Tips, or comment below.

Enjoy
POF Campaign Creation Walkthrough

1). Picking an Offer – 00:09
2). Finding an angle for said offer – 01:17
3). Creating an ad – 02:24
4). Layout of a lander - 03:03
5). Tracking with P202 – 03:35
6). Placing creatives in POF – 09:42

Synopsis of 16 Favorite Marketing TechCrunches Across 4 Months

June 24, 2012 by Tom Fang No Comments

TechCrunch is without a doubt one of my top sources to keep up with the latest in the greater technology world. It is highly web and software focused so it’s a great way to understand the latest technology landscape and project where traffic is going. They do a good job of covering the up and coming traffic sources as well as keep us informed of changes with the big boys like Facebook.

Today I’ve picked out my favorite articles in the last 4 months related to performance marketing, so if you don’t follow TechCrunch you’ll be able to digest the most pertinent articles for the last few months in just a few minutes. We make it so easy for you, right? Hope this gets you guys thinking about what’s coming next and maybe some new ideas.

Date Topic Headline Synopsis
6/22 Facebook Facebook Ads and Sponsored Stories Are Now Running On Zynga.com, Previewing A FB Ad Network Facebook is launching an AdSense-esque exchange that will use user data and cookies to power an offsite ad network. In its debut, it has launched both ads and Sponsored Stories on Zynga.
6/20 Facebook Social Media’s Impact On Mobile Commerce: Visits Are Up, Conversions Are Down Social media drives less than 1% of mobile website traffic, dominated by Facebook. Facebook conversion rates are declining, but average spending per user has gone up.
6/19 Local LocalResponse: Our Ad Network Has 7 Billion Impressions Per Month And Is Almost Profitable An ad network that serves more than 7 billion impressions per month targets ads based on social network and location data. Its inventory isn’t being filled 100% or even close to it. If you get approved as an advertiser, you gain self-serve access to their direct response and retargeting platforms.
6/19 Facebook They Work! Facebook Mobile Ads Are Clicked 13X More, Earn 11X More Money Than Its Desktop Ads Data from hundreds of millions of impressions on mobile Sponsored Stories put average CTR’s at an enormous 1.14% and $0.86 CPC. Desktop Sponsored Stories average to 0.59% CTR and $0.63 CPC.
6/15 Search Hitwise: Google US Search Share Down 5% In The Last Year; Bing, Yahoo Gained Don’t count Bing out at almost 30% market share. They’ve made some really great strides in the last year with their search product. They’ve incorporated social into search and have an alliance with Facebook. Plus, they are a lot more affiliate friendly than Adwords.
6/13 Skype Skype For Windows Now Features “Conversation Ads” Not only will there be in-client ads in the home screen, Skype has rolled out “conversation ads”, which are display ads for free Skype users that show up during a call. To run advertising here, you will need to contact Microsoft’s Skype sales.
6/2 Mobile Monetizing Mobile Requires More Than Just Waiting For Ad Dollars This is a great article that explains why the money in mobile isn’t matching up to the hype it’s getting at its current infant stage. The main problem comes back to relevance and targeting. Mobile lacks cookies and GPS technology isn’t there in most phones.
5/31 Retargeting Business-Focused Ad Startup Bizo Launches Self-Serve Retargeting Market to a business audience using Bizo’s self-serve platform. The traffic is the type who would sign up on LinkedIn. Bizo is trusted by major brands like AMEX, AT&&T, Microsoft, and Salesforce.com.
5/30 Mobile Mary Meeker: “Mobile Monetization Has More Going For It Than Early Desktop Monetization Had” Global mobile Internet traffic is growing rapidly right now and has now reached about 10% of all Internet traffic, but only 1% of all ad spend is mobile. Mobile ad spend is going to skyrocket once technology improves in the next couple of years.
5/10 Retargeting Kleiner Perkins And Sequoia Fund $6.5M Round For Cross-Device Ad Targeter Drawbridge Started by a veteran of AdMob, Drawbridge aims to identify the same person as he or she uses multiple devices so that ads can be targeted toward the same person seamlessly.
5/3 Facebook Facebook’s “Offers” News Feed Coupons Launch In Self-Serve Beta For Local U.S. Businesses If you have a Facebook fan page, you can advertise coupons through Facebook Offers that appear in News Feed. It’s meant for local small businesses so you have to establish yourself that way for whatever you’re promoting, but then it’s free to run offers.
4/18 Internet Ad Revenue Reaches $31B In 2011, Mobile Up 149 Percent (IAB Report) Internet ad revenue grew 22% in 2011 to an all-time high of $31 billion. This means this industry continues to grow year after year. The final 3 months were also the all-time best quarter at $9 billion, with mobile growing the fastest.
4/11 Mobile Adfonic Announces TV-Style Mobile Ad Units Popular mobile ad network Adfonic launches its first video ad units. The videos begin via a display banner and traffic isn’t rerouted to YouTube or anywhere else. The video takes over the whole screen. Each ad unit is recommended to be 15-30 seconds.
3/26 Twitter Twitter Launches Advertising Program For Small Business In Partnership With American Express Twitter launches Promoted Tweets. With Promoted Accounts you pay per follow ($0.50-$1.25 per follow), and with Promoted Tweets, you pay per click. Twitter recommends a maximum bid of at least $0.75. The tweets still come from the single twitter account that is associated with the ad account, so it’s really meant for small businesses, but this could be the beginning.
3/22 Mobile Kiip, The Mobile Ad Rewards Network, Rumored To Raise Another $8-10M To Conquer Games And Beyond Kiip is a platform that replaces straight display ads with real life redeemable rewards. It has launched a self-serve platform in March 2012. It now has inventory from 140 apps (with 100 in the pipeline) reaching 30 million users.
3/6 Mobile Jumptap: Android, iOS Now 91% Of All Mobile Ad Traffic, Kindle Fire 33% Of All Tablet Use Android and iOS completely dominate mobile ad traffic, claiming 91% market share. If you are marketing on mobile, this is where you should focus if you want volume. Feature phones will be gone soon and this is where the future is.

POF Case Study: How High to Bid for Top Placement With 728×90 Wide Banners

June 11, 2012 by Aziz Kamara 7 Comments

In POF, 728×90 “Wide Banners” run in the same locations as the smaller 310×110 and 110×80 “Small Ads”. If you have two identically-targeted campaigns, however, the one running Small Ads will get delivered at an earlier session depth than the one running Wide Banners, unless you raise the bid of the wide banners well beyond that of the small ads. Simply put: Small Ads set at a bid of, say, $0.63 will always appear in an earlier session depth than wide banners set at the same amount.

The question we’re going to try to attempt to answer with today’s case study is: how much higher of a bid would you have to set for Wide Banners than Small Ads in order to achieve the same session depth?

How the Data was Gathered

I set up two separate broad male campaigns with the same targeting. The only difference was one ran Small Ads, and the other ran Wide Banners. Next, I set the initial bids of each campaign to $0.63. The $0.63 bid was when the Small Ads campaign first showed up in the first 5 session depths.

Using a POF user profile, I logged into POF and tracked the creative delivery and what session depths the creatives were delivered for each campaign. We’ll refer to this process as one login. I logged in and followed this procedure 10 times at the $0.63 bid level. For each log in, I refreshed until a session depth of 30 was achieved and in the process, recorded exactly when an ad from each campaign was displayed.

Subsequently, I kept the Small Ads campaign constant at $0.63 bid while increasing the bid of the Wide Banners campaign by $0.10 after every 10th login and tracked when ads showed up at what session depths just like we did previously. We do this so we can see exactly at what bid level does the Wide Banners campaign finally starts overtaking the Small Ads campaign in terms of session depth. That is, how much higher do the Wide Banners campaign have to bid in order to be shown before the Small Ads campaign?

It should also be noted that I monitored creative delivery within a 2-hour period, allowing a 5-minute break in between bid changes to allow the bid increase to take effect.

Below are the findings of just the Wide Banners campaign:

How to Read the Graph

This graph displays 3 major components:

  1. CPM bids – The Y-Axis indicates the bids at which the Wide Banners campaign was run. As I mentioned before, I incrementally increased the bid of the “Wide Banner Campaign” by $0.10 after collecting data from 10 logins at every bid level. I only increased the bid a total of 6 times (from a base of $0.63 to a maximum of $1.23).
  2. Frequency at which an ad was delivered per session depth – You may notice a series of dots stacked on top of one another. I set the graph up this way to visually represent the number of times an ad showed up at each session depth. The “Averages” at the bottom of the graph indicates the average session depth the ads showed up in for every bid level. The “Mode” indicates the session depth at which ads were delivered most frequently.
  3. Session Depth – The X-Axis represents the session depth at which ads appeared. For example, the earliest a Wide Banner was delivered when its CPM was set to $0.63 (refer to the blue circles), was on the 7th page/refresh.

Comparing Wide Banners Campaign with the Small Ads Campaign as Control

I simultaneously monitored and tracked the session depths of the Small Ads, which were kept at a constant bid of $0.63, and their relative session of delivery to the Wide Banners for each login.

This graph demonstrates our findings:

How to Read the Graph

  1. All data points, red or blue, represent the difference in session depth between the 2 campaigns for a given login. For example, for the $0.63 bid level, the difference in when ads were delivered between the 2 campaigns was in one case as large as 19 session depths apart.
  2. The red dots represent that Small Ads were displayed earlier, while the blue dots indicate that Wide Banners were displayed earlier. For example, at the $0.83 bid level, for one of the logins, Small Ads were displayed as much as 8 session depths before Wide Banners.
  3. “Session Depth Difference” – The X-Axis represents the number of pages separated between the appearance of one campaign to another.

Major Observations

As mentioned above, at a bid of $0.63, Small Ads were granted top placement. As the first graph shows, Wide Banners, when set to the same $0.63 bid as Small Ads, didn’t show up until the 7th refresh at the very earliest.

We also see that, according to the first graph, Wide Banners could not achieve the first 3 session depths until the bid was set at at least $0.83. Even at $0.83, the average session depth Wide Banners showed up in was 7, while Small Ads, of course, were able to achieve top placement with just $0.63.

In addition, according to the second graph, Wide Banners never overtook Small Ads in placement until we set the bid for the Wide Banners campaign to at least $0.93, and even at $0.93, Small Ads were placed first in most instances (as indicated by more red dots versus blue).

Case Study Conclusions

This won’t come as a surprise, but in order for the Wide Banners to compete for the same traffic as Small Ads and receive the same amount of traffic, they have to be at a significantly higher bid level. How much higher? At least 50%-70% higher.

The big question then is “Is it worth it?” and for that, I personally say HELL YEAH IT’S WORTH IT! When served properly, these 728×90 banners mean you don’t have to fight for the attention of the user with two other ads! Of course you’re going to need to make sure that you test properly and make sure the payout to your offer can compensate for the increased bid. Just make sure that you’re not serving a turd sandwich to the user so you don’t end up wasting valuable real estate.

Furthermore, the mechanics of how POF serves these ads gives me another reason for why we should never straight up duplicate campaigns for more traffic. When you duplicate a campaign, you may be paying double for the same set of eyes. Your campaigns essentially compete with each other. While the Wide Banners are more expensive, they allow you to place up to 3 Small Ads in them if you so choose. It’s a much better deal than running 2 or 3 of the same Small Ads campaigns for the same traffic.

So don’t be afraid to venture into unknown territory and try your hand at some Wide Banners. Just make sure to increase that bid and capitalize on that space!